Nicolas Piton1,2, Audrey Mansuet-Lupo3, Lara Chalabreysse4, Romain Dubois5, Véronique Hofman6, Cécile Le Naoures7, Vincent Thomas de Montpréville8, Anne De Muret9, Marie Parrens10, Isabelle Rouquette11, Véronique Secq12, Jean-Philippe Dales13, Damien Sizaret9, Pascale Missy14, Quân Tran14, Édith Bazéli15, Alexander Marx16, Nicolas Girard17, Benjamin Besse18, Thierry Jo Molina15
1Department of Pathology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France;
2Inserm U1245, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France;
3Department of Pathology, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP and INSERM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France;
4Department of Pathology, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;
5Institut de Pathologie, CHU de Lille, Lille, France;
6Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, Biobank 0033-00025, Université Côte d’Azur, Hôpital Pasteur, Nice, France;
7Department of Pathology, CHU of Rennes, Rennes, France;
8Department of Pathology, Marie-Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, France;
9Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France;
10UMR 1312 INSERM, Department of Pathology, CHU de Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France;
11Centre of Pathology des Coteaux, Toulouse, France;
12Department of Pathology, CHU Felix Guyon Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France;
13APHM, Department of Pathology, Hôpital Nord, Pavillon Etoile, Pôle de Biologie-Pathologie, Marseille, France;
14French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT), Paris, France;
15Department of Pathology, Necker and Robert Debré, AP-HP, INSERM U1163, Imagine Institute, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France;
16Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany;
17Institute of Thorax, Curie Montsouris, Institut Curie, Paris, France;
18Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
Correspondence to: Nicolas Piton, MD, PhD. Department of Pathology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France; Inserm U1245, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France. Email: nicolas.piton@chu-rouen.fr.
Background: Basaloid carcinoma of the thymus is a well-defined but rare entity. The French RYTHMIC network is dedicated to the management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors, organizing an expert review for each included case.
Methods: To study basaloid carcinoma of the thymus, we selected all RYTHMIC diagnoses comprising “basaloid carcinoma” in the conclusion for panel reviewing.
Results: Between 2013 and 2022, 17 cases were identified. However, 4 large biopsies were discarded (3 poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomas and 1 composite tumor with a chondroid blastematous component) and 2 small biopsies because of uncertainty of sufficient basaloid feature. In total, the panel retained 11 patients (9 tumor resection, 1 surgical biopsy and 1 needle biopsy), with 64% of males (n=7) and 36% of females (n=4), mean age at diagnosis was 70 [standard deviation (SD) =11, range: 46–82]. Among them, 4/8 were UICC stage I, 1 IIIa, 1 IVa and 2 IVb. Resections were qualified R0 for 6/7 and R1 for 1/7. Two patients metastatic at presentation were alive, with a follow-up of 7 and 8 years. Microscopically, all 11 tumors showed a basophilic appearance; 54% (n=6) contained comedonecrosis, and keratinisation was observed in only 1 case. 8 cases showed peripheral palisading. Cystic changes were observed in 6 cases (54%), with 5 with a “cystic papillary pattern”. In all 11 tumors, the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio was high and the nucleolus was distinct (7 cases with a small one, 1 medium and 3 large). Seven lesions presented with a high number of mitoses, and the mean Ki67 index on the hotspot was 35% (SD =16). Immunohistochemically, 9/9 tumors expressed p40 (or p63), 10/10 CK5/6, 10/11 CD5, 7/8 CD117, 0/11 NUT, 1/11 chromogranin A (very weak and focal), 2/11 synaptophysin (<50% of tumor cells), 4/11 CD56. During the studied period, we reviewed 1,645 thymic epithelial tumors, the incidence of basaloid carcinoma being 0.7%.
Conclusions: Basaloid carcinoma of the thymus is a challenging diagnosis to make, especially on needle biopsy. Comedonecrosis, cystic papillary pattern as well as coexpression of CD5 and CD117 are important features. Despite a high proliferative index, long survival is observed even when metastatic at presentation.
Keywords: Basaloid carcinoma; thymic epithelial tumor; thymic carcinoma; diagnosis